Monday, March 13, 2017

James Newton Howard - Unbreakable: Weightlifting


Unbreakable: Weightlifting

In 2001 Uncle Pat returned a favor to dad with a DVD player.

The family crowded around the TV awaiting a revelation in picture and sound.  A blue sky, clearer than life, with pure white clouds filled the screen, background for a monolith that read “Sony”. In an azure box in the screen’s top right corner: “Insert DVD”. 

That’s when we realized we had to buy DVDs.  

An eternity later mom took us to Sam’s Club. As we passed the DVD section, I, at my mother's side, like a four foot Wormtongue, noted that some $29.99 DVDs were marked down to $17.88. 

Mom never bought one of us a twenty dollar item because then she’d have to buy five of us a twenty dollar item.  But somehow, the wholesale price, my excitement and the $300 paperweight in her living room changed her. She bought Unbreakable for me. 

They don’t make DVD cases like Unbreakable’s anymore. A black and blue sleeve with a window to a beautifully designed “Unbreakable” logo: reflective gray lines and jagged blue smoke evoking broken glass and the supernatural. The case folded out. Two DVDs - one for the movie, one for “special features”, whatever those were. 

Most memorable was the FBI warning, which unexpectedly shattered into pieces with a crack I used to show off DVD quality sound. 

The DVD player's remote had dozens of buttons, each linked to functions I later used to dissect my favorite movies. There was an “AB Repeat”, used to watch Trinity’s first jump on an endless loop. “Step” pushed the movie forward one frame at a time so I could make flip book recreations of The Phantom Menace's lightsaber duels. The “Next Chapter” button skipped to all my favorite Fellowship of the Ring parts in seconds (before that you had to fast forward through the whole damn tape). I slow motioned every fight scene, becoming aware of the editing tricks.  

All this would come later.  But it all started with Unbreakable.

Unbreakable means even more to me. My father was a cop.  When I was young he never spoke to me about patrol, but I’d hear snatches of stories, of him wresting a gun from a criminal, of shots in the streets, of ramming fugitive motorcycles in the patrol car. I’d see the worn leather holster on his ankle when he sat down to dinner, and hear him unload his revolver before he went to sleep, hear the bullets fall into his hand.

My dad was a cop, a good one, who risked his life to help people. He was over six foot and built like a rugby player. I was an undersized, bookish kid. If you’ve seen Unbreakable, you know how I could relate to its father-son dynamic. 

But it was more than that. Specific moments of the film were ripped from my life, like the benchpress scene. Sometimes before work dad went down to the basement to lift weights. He’d be on the bench while I sat on the stationary bike reaching for the pedals. He’d tell me while he benched, “pushups are the way to go, don’t worry about benching. Pushups are the full body work out”, which was his way to discourage me from trying out the bench when he wasn’t there. He’d give me a hand grip strengthener, saying it was the most important: “If, when you first grab the bad guy, your grip is strong, you scare the shit out of them, they won’t mess with you”. As he curled his fingers around the bar, my dad told me, almost exactly as Bruce Willis does: “If anything bad happens, get Mom”.

On top of that, Unbreakable's weightlifting scene appealed because it is masterfully filmed. Bruce Willis’s character David Dunn adds more and more weight to his bench at the prodding of his son, so that they can determine his max. Finally, all available weights are attached to the bar. Dunn seems to struggle, but he benches this impossible weight several times. It’s almost proof that he has superhuman capabilities. 

Dunn’s so strong, he even benches the weight of the camera: as he drops the bar down the camera falls; as he pushes up, the camera lifts. On his next rep the camera forgets this convention and settles in disbelief on Dunn's face. Great filmmaking. 

But even better than the camera was the score. 

All the above, the specific manner in which I related to this scene, I didn’t realize that was happening. I just felt a compulsion to watch the scene over and over. From the same impulse I found and downloaded the music to the scene, which is called “Weightlifting”. 

For years I’d listen to "Weightlifting", most of the time in the car or in bed, just visualizing the scene, syncing it to the music in my head. 

At some point, I read about a piece of music in film, how it developed with a character, and reached its full form when the character did (it was from soundtrackreviews.com, a site, that while at times pretentious and dismissive of non-orchestra music, is remarkable for its reviews’ focus on musical analysis).

So my first step in unravelling the mystery of this song’s power over me, was recognizing that its central conceit is the development of a theme, Bruce Willis’s character’s David Dunne’s hero theme.

You can here a full rendition of the theme at :22 in “The Orange Man”. 

There are two parts to the theme. Part A is the build from :23 to :29. Part B, :30 to :37, is a repeated flourish that overflows that build. The A build is not much more than a D note, to a dominant 5th A, to a higher D. That may seem like it has no meaning to you, but it does. It’s a known progression that somehow sounds elemental and heroic. John Williams’ Superman theme manipulates the same note proportions, as does the beginning of Strauss’ "Also Sprach Zarathustra". 

So Howard picked an elemental and heroic set of notes for his hero. Then he played them at a rate that matches the hero’s arc. The first two notes are held for a long time, then the following notes come quick: the A part of the theme is hesitant to take on its full heroic nature. Just like David Dunn, we are uncertain for a long time as to whether the theme will accept that it is a hero.  

The B part of the theme plays around that high D note, that is, plays around the fulfillment of the heroic nature, and repeats, restates its own heroic nature: it’s accepted that it is a hero. The theme’s composition is an outline for David Dunn’s character progression, his acceptance that he has superhuman abilities.

Whenever the theme is fully stated in the movie, it’s when David Dunn accepts that he has superhuman capabilities. But, for the most of the movie he doesn’t accept this. So, for most of the movie, Howard only gives us quiet or truncated versions of this theme. 

Nowhere is this more apparent than “Weightlifting”. In the piece, we keep getting weak versions of the theme, or halves of it. 

At the very the beginning, there are two repetitions of the A part of the theme (not part B). Dunn has the realization that he can bench an unexpected amount of weight. Something remarkable happened, but not out of the realm of normal possibility. Dunn is not convinced that he is superhuman. So only the A part of the theme is played, and it’s played vaguely and with minimal accompaniment. 

Then at :41 the A part of the theme comes back twice, stronger. Once as a lone trumpet, once as a bunch of strings with accompaniment. This coincides with Dunn being able to bench even more weight. 

 At 1:01, we finally hear the B part of the theme, but it’s high and vague, almost spectral, and unnaturally extenuated, trailing off.  

At 1:17, the A part repeats twice. There is something interesting rhythmically going on underneath. We’ll come back to it soon. 

Finally at 1:42 the hero theme plays, still not in full grandeur, but with strong accompaniment. It’s the first strong statement of the full theme. It coincides with Dunn lifting what is almost certainly a superhuman amount of weight. 

But more happens at 1:47. There is a dramatic lift to the music here that comes from something other than the choice of instruments or their volume or the playing of the theme. 

I remember being on a 12 hour trip in my family’s E-350, listening over and over to this part, trying to figure out what gives this section its extra left. 

The answer is rhythm. Contrast the rhythm of the song from 1:17 to 1:47, with from 1:47 on. Rhythm is hard to nail down, but just feel the music and see how your foot taps to it. From 1:17, my foot taps to the piano rhythm, that delicate, tentative, but magical piano. It’s a quick rhythm, to me it sounds like…for example, from 1:18 to 1:21 (one cycle of the piano piece) - that sounds like 6 beats to me, three sets of 2 beats (the first four of which sound like a ping pong between two notes on the piano). That pattern is repeated until 1:43.

Now there is an almost rhythmless span between here and 1:46. This is the precise moment in the film when Dunn lifts the weigh off its rest and lets the weight drop. 

Rhythm is a very soothing aspect of music, because it lets us know what our immediate future will be: our future will be this beat, over and over. But right here, we come to a part in the movie where the future isn’t certain: will Dunn lift the weight? Accordingly, the rhythm becomes less certain. 

Right at the end of 1:43, a big drum sounds. This is an amazing touch. 

Do you lift? There is a moment after you lift the weight off its hold when you feel the weight come down on you: that’s what that drum represents. The end of the quick, weak piano rhythm marks the moment when Dunn’s made the decision to go into the unknown and lift the weight; that drum at 1:43 is the moment an instant later when he can feel the full weight press down on his palms. 

The rhythm of the next section, the section that finally strongly states the hero theme, becomes apparent at 1:47, with a drum beat and a sustained bass harmony. It’s a much slower rhythm then the piano rhythm we had before, and I think that’s what gives this section so much more strength. 

The rhythm is so slow that the first beat is at 1:47, but the second doesn’t come until 1:49. That doesn’t seem slow on paper, but it’s an eternity in sound. Consider that from 1:18 to 1:21, we heard 6 full beats of the weak piano rhythm. Here, it takes almost 2 seconds for 1 full beat. 

That longer beat, along with the muscular, singular bass emphasizing it, gives the undercurrent of the first statement of the theme so much more strength. Each beat is holding up seconds of music, instead of fractions of seconds. 

The difference in rhythmic strength is like the difference between New Year’s Resolution John blasting 6 reps of just the bar (the weak 6 beat piano measure from 1:18 to 1:21) vs. Arnold doing 5 slow, controlled reps of 200 lbs.  (the 5 beats from 1:47 to 1:59). 

So Howard sonically recreates the experience of lifting a large amount of weight, mostly through rhythm: the nervous expectation is in the quick, weak rhythm of the piano; the feeling of the weight crushing down on you is in that first drum beat at 1:43; the growing strength and resolve of a well done rep is in that strong, slow rhythm and bass from 1:47 on.

The use of rhythm here was a revelation for me, laying on that car bench on a long road trip. It came to me through feel: I observed how my hand impulsively waved to the music, how from 1:17 my hand moved quickly with the piano, and how from 1:47 it moved slowly and deliberately with the bass and drum. 

Up until this point, I was a fair observer of melody, but barely registered rhythm. This piece changed me. “Weighlifting”’s rhythmic shift had been playing on me for years without my notice, keeping me coming back. Its effect still leaves me speechless, even though its mystery is gone. Melody is interesting. Rhythm is powerful. People are the same as music. Unnoticed rhythms drive our feelings and actions. Do you hear them? 


EXTRA: "The Wreck", from 1:00 to 2:30, is another highlight. There’s this descending bass of dread that marks Dunn’s fear for his girlfriend and an anxious hopeful build at 1:35, especially in the violin flourish from 1:44 to 1:47, when he sees there is a chance to save her. 

All the while a strange rhythmic uniformity builds great tension. At 1:59 a violin hit cuts through the tension, and then everything but the strings falls out as we see Dunn use his superhuman strength to save her.  A powerful rendition of the theme gathers. 

The 1:59 violin hit that coincides with Dunn bending the door is one of my favorite moments in film. I think it’s because, before that point, the music scores ours and teenager Dunn’s dread. But after that point, it scores ours and present-day Dunn’s recognition that Dunn is superhuman. 

I think what gets me is that while we experience that recognition through this triumphant music after 1:59, the teenager Dunn of the memory doesn’t recognize it. On screen underneath the triumphant music, we still see an extremely anxious Dunn. He is oblivious to the fact that he just did something impossible. He is so focused on saving the girl.  

To me that is beautiful. To push yourself to do something that every single person who witnessed it would see as superhuman, but to not notice it yourself, because you are so focused on helping someone else. His self disappeared. That’s love. This emotional aspect is not visible in the visuals, the music communicates it. 

Friday, March 10, 2017

Radiohead - 15 Step

15 Step

Whenever Thom Yorke shrill pierced my ears in high school I threw the headphones across the room. 

Later, a disaffected college friend gave me The Bends. 

Before The Bends my music universe was the Greenday and Limp Bizkit tracks I traded my Drake’s apple pies for a listen, the Led Zeppelin my '70s drummer track coach insisted was best, and The White Stripes. 

Each of these rocks had a unique flavor, but most of their experiments were references to the past, or to other genres, or, as with Zeppelin, didn’t register as such, since Zeppelin stood alone and immovable as Stonehenge, had always been what it was. 

The Bends was still rock, but now there was something more. 

I couldn’t stop listening to “Just”. The build up of the chorus guitar, and especially, the extended build in last chorus (from 2:45 to 3:10), brought me back again and again. 

It’s four repetitions going up the scale, each time lifting an octave, suggesting approach to a climax. Then, the guitar maxes out with a sustained pitch. The song feels like it’s about to end, but picks up and stumbles on, a desperate lead guitar over exhausted descending chords. 

The end guitar didn’t learn the chorus guitar’s lesson. The end guitar just repeated it and shifted it upwards again and again and turned it into something as shrill and negative as Thom Yorke’s voice. It did it to itself. 

I also enjoyed the janky “My Iron Lung” and later had a lot of fun playing it on guitar. The transition two minutes in from stultified electric ballad to cagey depressed punk is fun as hell to play. Even a guitarist who can’t subtly emote can provide contrast between the two sides of this transition just by feeling the music, by going from gentle to hard on the frets and the pick. 

These hard to digest but satisfying touches kept me with Radiohead until I completely, or as completely as anyone can, adapted to Thom Yorke. When my listening attention was somewhere in the middle I could still hear him, but when listening casually or intensely I could not. 

Around this time Radiohead offered In Rainbows for free download, or not free, but whatever you decided to pay, which meant, free (please support Monophone on Patreon).  As with most new albums, the first listen disappointed. I still don’t get “Jigsaw Falling Into Place” and “Weird Fishes/Arpeggi”. They have an improvisational feel, as if the band came to the mic with nothing but misplaced confidence and these songs were the result. 

But I love “15 Step”. My favorite part is the middle, but there are so many other interesting things about this song. 

First, it’s written in 5/4 time. This means it's built on a repetition of 5 beats. So much of what we listen to is based on 2 or 3 beats or multiples thereof. For you computer people, I think the reason why it’s 2 and 3 has something to do with the RAM of the brain, with what the brain can hold in instant use memory. The next prime number after 2 and 3 is 5 - and that pushes the limits of our RAM. 

For you chocolate inclined: 5 beats is too big to be swallowed. In 2 and 3 based music and multiples thereof, we’re eating snack sized and regular sized Twix, they go down quickly and well enough. But 5 beat music is like king sized Twix: that’s pushing it. You have to ask yourself, at what point is it a Twix bar, at what point is it an indeterminate mass of chocolate and caramel? It seems like the tipping point is 5 beats. 

The brain is not used to the 5 beat structure, so Radiohead eases us into it. 

The beginning of the song is a sonic mess - static, crunchy, disjunct beats - for the most part, formless. A metaphor for what 5/4 sounds like to our brains. 

But one sound distinguishes itself. Every once in a while, you’ll hear BUMF - the bass drum. It marks the beginning of each 5 beat structure. So when we hear it, we know one measure has passed and another just began. You can use that BUMF to discern the 5 beat structure, even though the crunchy digital drums and the off kilter clapping try to disguise it.

The result is twofold: in the cacophony, the music gives you one definitive BUMF to orient yourself. You hold on to and recognize that BUMF because its the only thing that is clearly distinguishable. 

At the same time, the cacophony here provides a contrast for the slightly less cacophonous, but still 5/4 beat to come. 

This is crucial. Imagine the song without the cacophonous beginning, if it started at 24 seconds. You would be dropped into an unsettling 5/4 world. However, by having an even more bizarre 24 seconds first, dropping into 5/4 world at 24 seconds becomes a comfort. Now when you drop into it, you are already oriented by the BUMF, that is, you know where the measures begin and end. 

Not the thing itself, but what proceeds it, makes the thing less strange. The talking rabbit probably discomfited Alice more than Queen of Hearts, because before Alice saw the Queen of Hearts, she had seen a talking rabbit. 

The melody starts at :41. I love it because there is something circular, flowing and smooth about it. Like water in some state between liquid and solid. 

What gives it this quality is how the high and low notes of the guitar play against each other. On the downbeat, at the beginning of each measure, is a bass note, then a series of higher notes. The higher notes are trending down towards the next bass note. When that bass note sounds, it’s both the end of the higher notes, and the bass note for the next set of higher notes. This is possible because the bass note is the last note of the higher notes, but shifted down an octave, so it’s also low enough to be the bass for the next phrase. 

So that note occupies two states. In the same way, we are so used to 2 beat and 4 beat measures, that the fifth beat confuses the brain, makes uncertain whether the note is in the current measure or the next measure - the last beat of each measure occupies two states rhythmically, just as that bass notes occupies two states for the melody. This makes the transition between these phrases smooth, almost otherworldly. 

The second verse is the most remarkable part, but the first verse must be explored because it sets up the second. 

To me everything is prelude until :53. Then there’s 12 measures that make the first part of verse 1. Here the music composition is simple. Guitar with a little bass and a little melody and drums. Actually, the drums are complex, the beat and the overlay of handclaps. But that complexity has lost its strangeness, since we’ve been listening to it for almost a minute by now. 

There is almost no development or variation in these 12 measures. The only element that alters is the lyrics. Finally, at 1:12 is a build up, layers are added, giving momentum.  Rocking cymbals. The bass kicks in. The lead guitar modulates up, suggesting it’s heading towards climax. Yorke holds each word he sings much longer than before (“onnnnnnee byyyyyyyyyy onnnnnnneeee…”)

This is a great build up, but it’s still basic. Modulating up the melody, bringing more bass, lengthening the vocal notes and crashing cymbals are standard pop methods for giving a structure more power. It’s satisfying, but unoriginal. 

What happens next is a deconstruction and then rebuilding of musical momentum. At 1:45 all aspects of the preceding music are present, but flattened out. The guitar melody is simplified, rocking back and forth between two chords instead of the four chord progression it had before. The vocals change from fully formed thoughts expressed in words to a moan, a one pitch moan that eerily builds up. The bass goes from a four chord harmony to one single repeated note. The drums go from a dynamic beat to almost random hits building into a drum roll. 

This is the same music we have been listening to, but it’s folded into itself, flattening from three dimensions to two. Still the drums and the rising vocal indicate buildup… and then at 1:57 we’re back, the music gets expanded to three dimensions again. 

You often experience an effect like this in pop rock songs, where the music is quiet for a while and then gets loud all of a sudden. Often it goes from loud electric to soft acoustic and then back to loud electric again. Radiohead here performs the calculus equivalent of that algebra. Instead of lowering and raising volume, this music lowers and raises its complexity. The brain recognizes this without knowing it does, and I think that’s why the transition at 1:57 feels so good. It’s both unexpected and expected, it leaves you a little breathless. 

But now, where do we go from here? You’re primed to think verse 2 is going to continue to raise the stakes by how the stakes have been raised in verse 1. Even more so, because cymbals are present at the beginning of verse 2, the cymbals which didn’t come in till late in verse 1. So it’s a fair assumption that, because verse 2 starts at a more musically complex place than verse 1, it will end at a more complex place. 

But at 2:03 the cymbals die off. If you have difficulty hearing the cymbals, just listen to when he sings “et cetera, et cetera”. It sounds like things have calmed down.

All that has changed is the cymbals stopped. But why? Why step down the musical complexity here? We’ve already been at this level of complexity, and we’re supposed to be going someplace further. 

Here I think, we see how the musical choices work with the lyrics. So far, Yorke has been whining about something that keeps happening to him: 

How come I end up where I started 
How come I end up where I belong
Won’t take my eyes off the ball again
You reel me out then you cut the string 

To me it sounds like some girl keeps winding him up and then betraying him over and over, and  he’s frustrated he never learns his lesson. That’s not necessarily what the lyrics mean, but the sense that something keeps happening to him again and again with bad results, and that he is frustrated,  is certainly in the lyrics. 

So while verse 1 develops in a standard way, verse 2 feels like it’s going to ramp up the tension with the cymbals, then it hits us with these unexpected, disjointed developments: silencing the cymbals at 2:03, hitting us with a little bass at 2:08, having children yell at 2:13, using a strange echo effect at 2:18. 

The conventional means of developing music exhibited in verse 1 are thrown out. Instead, jarring stops and strange fragments texture the music. 

Why? Did Radiohead just want to be edgy, different, say ”Fuck your expectations. Cut the cymbals and bring out the children’s choir”?

Perhaps, but I think they were also trying to compliment the lyrics here. The first verse is about a disgruntled guy, tired of being wronged. He’s even taking his oppressor to task: 

You used to be alright
What happened? 
Did the cat get your tongue? 
Did your string come undone?

Those last two questions are rhetorical, nagging and sarcastic. He’s having it out with the person who wronged him. 

In verse 2, he’s doing the same thing:

You used to be alright
What happened?

But here, instead of coming up with a accusatory question, he just says:

Etcetera, etcetera

It’s like he’s started to have it out with his oppressor, but tires and gives up even trying to come up with a good nag. The next line has the same character: 

Facts for whatever 

He’s not putting any thought into this confrontation any more. It has happened so many times before and now he is tired of it. 

It reminds me of Groundhog Day, movies of that type. The main character has been through this so many times before, he’s just rushing through his lines and half paying attention so he can get to the next part. 

The music I think, compliments this mind state. Whereas the verse 1 music builds into a nagging accusal, the verse 2 music is about to, but gives up at 2:03 (the same time the man in the lyrics gives up: “et cetera, et cetera”). Then, just like Bill Murray might, when reliving the same scene for the 20th time, he doesn't pay attention, just looks out the window.  So too does the music unexpectedly concern itself with a little bass at 2:08. At 2:13, it looks over at a TV with a children’s cartoon on and hears “YEAH!” At 2:18, the music is so used to the words it’s supposed to say, that it’s listening to how funny they sound, as represented by the echo of “15 steps”. 

The music is bored of this progression, of being angry at this person, of reacting and working up anger. This is the part where he’s supposed to get angry, so he gets angry, but his heart’s just not in the anger anymore. He’s experienced this too many times. 

The musical attention deficit we experience reinforces the experience of the lyrics.  

That’s why I love this song. So much musical meaning in two minutes. 

I didn't consciously think the above analysis until I sat down to write it. It was a wordless feeling of the musical quality, the music's gravity, that kept me in Radiohead's orbit until I acclimatized to Thom Yorke. 

Now when I listen to music and hear something off-putting, and start to raise my hand to the headphones to throw them across the room, I keep them on for a couple of seconds to feel for any pull.